Competent, Compassionate, and Cost Effective Legal Services in and around Cass County
Competent, Compassionate, and Cost Effective Legal Services in and around Cass County
At Hoefle Law, LLC, we understand that legal matters can be overwhelming. We are dedicated to providing personalized and compassionate support to each client. With years of experience in Landlord Tenant law, Hoefle Law, LLC is committed to achieving the best possible outcomes for your case. We pride ourselves on our attention to detail and our ability to navigate complex legal challenges. Let us be your trusted partner in your legal journey.
There are generally four types of lawsuits landlords typically file against tenants, which are discussed in more detail in the following sections. They are:
If your tenant’s only breach of the lease is non-payment of rent, and you do not mind if the tenant stays so long as the rent is paid, then a rent-and-possession case will be appropriate. Under Missouri rent-and-possession law, the tenant has the right to continued possession of the leased premises if they pay the rent and court costs before judgment is entered or the entire amount of the judgment within 10 days after the judgment is entered. Rent-and-possession actions usually arise simply from the non-payment of rent and are governed by Chapter 535 RSMo. To prevail in such a case, the only three things you need to prove are:
Techincally, a pre-suit demand for rent is not required to be in writing, it is much easier to prove the demand was made if you serve a written notice, particularly if the tenant disputes that demand was made. Most landlords use a written notice to make demand for rent before filing a rent-and-possession case. We have a form available for you to use on our forms below.
You should actually sue everyone occupying the premises (except minors) for rent and possession, even if not all of them signed the lease – with the understanding that those who did not sign the lease will not be legally liable for monetary obligations. This is very important because you can only get a judgment for possession against the named defendants, and the sheriff will only evict the defendants named in the judgment. Naming all occupants also can make it easier to serve the lawsuit in some cases because Missouri law includes roommates as “family members” upon whom service can be made in lieu of direct service upon all defendants.
It is clear under 1997 changes to Missouri statutes that you can include other matters besides non-payment of rent in a rent-and-possession case. For example, you can claim late fees, other amounts owed under the lease, and even attorney’s fees (if you have an appropriate attorney fee clause in your lease). However, if the tenant pays the rent and court costs on or before the date of judgment, the tenant will be entitled to retain possession of the premises; in such a case, you would still be able to get a monetary judgment against the tenant for the other items claimed in the lawsuit.
There is no right to a jury trial in the original trial of rent-and-possession cases, but if a new trial is requested, either side can request that the new trial be heard by a jury. Also, because jury trials are available in unlawful detainer cases, it is strongly recommended that landlords include a prominent clause in their leases whereby both the landlord and the tenant waive the right to a jury trial in any litigation involving the lease. To be clearly enforceable, attention must be drawn to a jury waiver clause in larger bold type immediately adjacent to the signature area on a lease.
A statutory provision adopted in 1997 provides that if the tenant has allowed someone else to have sole possession of the leased premises without the landlord’s permission, the court can award, in addition to rent due, damages not to exceed twice the rent due.
An unlawful detainer lawsuit should be filed if you want to evict the tenant no matter what – even if the rent is paid. Unlawful detainer is appropriate in any situation where the tenant retains possession of the leased premises after the lease terminates, including:
You can give a notice to terminate a lease for cause 10 days after the notice is served if the tenant does any of the following:
If you want to use unlawful detainer for breaching the lease by failing to pay rent, without a proper lease clause, you must make written demand for payment of rent on the exact day when the rent becomes due and for the precise amount due. We recommend the following language be in your lease agreement:
Upon lessee’s default or breach in the performance of any condition or covenant of this lease, including tenant’s obligation to pay rent, lessor shall be entitled to terminate this lease by giving written notice to lessee specifying lessee’s default or breach. Lessee agrees that such notice shall constitute sufficient notice to terminate the lease and for lessor to initiate an unlawful detainer action. Lessee waives all other common law or statutory notices.
If you need to make demand for rent see the form below.
If you want to evict a tenant even if the tenant cures the breach or breaches of the lease be sure to use the form below if your tenant:
If you want the right to evict if the tenant refuses or fails to correct a lease violation, then use the "right to cure" form blow.
There is a constitutional right to a jury trial in an unlawful detainer action. To avoid the substantial additional time and expense involved in a jury trial, it is strongly recommended that your lease include a clause whereby both you and the tenant waive the right to a jury trial in any litigation involving the lease. To be clearly enforceable, attention must be drawn to a jury waiver clause in larger bold type immediately adjacent to the signature area on a lease. Remedies in
an unlawful detainer case are:
Missouri law provides that if the tenant has allowed someone else to have sole possession of the leased premises without the landlord’s permission, the court can award, in addition to rent due, damages not to exceed twice the rent due.
Expedited evictions are allowed by statute. Missouri statutes 441.710 – 441.880 RSMo cover this process. It can be used to remove non-tenants as well as tenants from leased property.
Expedited Evictions are allowed for any one or more of the following grounds:
No advance notice is necessary to file for expedited eviction unless the perpetrator of the illegal activity is someone other than the actual tenant. If the perpetrator is someone other than the tenant, then you must give 5 days written notice to the tenant setting out the provisions of §441.750 RSMo. and specifying the grounds for expedited eviction. You can then file for expedited eviction against the tenant after 5 days unless the tenant delivers written notice to you within the 5-day period that the tenant has either: (1) sought a protective order, restraining order, order to vacate the premises, or other similar relief against the perpetrator, or (2) reported the illegal activity to a law enforcement agency or county prosecuting attorney in an effort to initiate a criminal proceeding against the perpetrator. There is a form neform below for this notice.
If you prove that the tenant was personally responsible for one or more of the grounds for expedited eviction, the court will order the tenant evicted.
If someone other than the tenant was the perpetrator and you prove one or more of the grounds for expedited eviction, but the tenant proves that he or she in no way furthered, promoted, aided or assisted in the illegal activity, and that he or she did not know or have reason to know the activity was occurring or was unable to prevent the activity because of verbal or physical coercion by the perpetrator, then the court can order the perpetrator excluded from the property but cannot evict the tenant. If the tenant cannot prove these defenses, however, the tenant can also be evicted.
The court can order the expedited eviction enforced by a law enforcement agency within a number of days specified by the court.
Expedited eviction can be pursued even if criminal prosecution has not been commenced, will not be commenced, has not been concluded, or has been concluded without a conviction. In any event, relevant evidence obtained in good faith by a law enforcement officer is admissible in an expedited eviction proceeding. If a criminal proceeding involving the drug-related criminal activity has resulted in the conviction of the tenant or another defendant in the expedited eviction case, the conviction can be introduced in evidence in the expedited eviction.
You can continue collecting rent from a tenant while an expedited eviction case is proceeding.
If the court finds that the tenant or another person should be evicted or excluded from the leased premises, the court must postpone the eviction or exclusion if the tenant or other person asks for a postponement and proves six points to the court’s satisfaction: (1) the person is a drug user and drug-dependent and will promptly enter a court-approved drug treatment program, or the tenant did not aid or assist in the drug-related criminal activity; (2) the drug-related activity did not occur within 1,000 feet of a school and did not involve the sale or distribution of drugs to minors; (3) a weapon or firearm was not used or possessed in connection with the drug-related activity; (4) the court has not issued and will not issue an order to protect witnesses in the case; (5) the person has not previously received a postponement of eviction or exclusion in an expedited eviction case; and (6) the postponement will not endanger the safety, health or well-being of the surrounding community or the landlord. If you submit an appropriate written request to the court, the court will notify you if a request for postponement is filed and give you the opportunity to participate in any hearings on the postponement.
If the court grants the postponement, the tenant will be placed on “probationary tenancy” for 6 months or the remaining lease term, whichever is shorter. The court can specify conditions for the probationary tenancy to protect the landlord and those living nearby and to further the purposes of the expedited eviction law. Conditions that can be imposed include periodic drug testing, community service, and participation in a treatment program.
If the tenant no longer occupies the leased premises, then any claims you may have against the departed tenant may be pursued as ordinary contract claims.
Typical claims that are pursued in such cases include:
Counties do vary a bit on procedures, but most are at least similar to this outline.
First, as with any lawsuit we file a “petition” with the court. Landlord-tenant cases are filed in the Associate Division of the Circuit Court, which has statutory jurisdiction over rent-and-possession, unlawful detainer and expedited eviction cases. We will need a signed “verification” to submit with the petition, which is a sworn statement that the allegations made in the petition are true to the best of your knowledge.
A filing fee must be paid when the petition is filed. The filing fee is actually an advance deposit toward anticipated court costs. When the case is over, if you win a judgment against the defendant and can collect the judgment, you will also be entitled to recover the actual court costs.
After the petition is filed and the filing fee is paid, the next step is “service” of the lawsuit on the defendant(s). It is a fundamental principle in our system of justice that you cannot obtain legal relief against another person through the courts unless that person is aware of the case and has an opportunity to respond. The “summons” served on the defendant along with a copy of the petition will notify the defendant of the initial court date. Service of the lawsuit can be done by a sheriff’s deputy who personally delivers the summons and petition to the defendant or a member of the defendant’s family at the residence. If you want faster service, you can ask your attorney to have the court appoint a private process server to serve the lawsuit, this may be more expensive but also may be more reliable.
Both rent-and-possession and unlawful detainer cases can also be served by “posting” and mail – that is, by affixing a copy of the summons and petition on the door of the leased premises and mailing a copy to the defendant. The posting must be done by a sheriff’s deputy or special process server, and the mailing must be accomplished by you or your attorney. The downside to posting is that you cannot obtain a monetary judgment against the defendant – only a judgment for eviction – unless the defendant personally appears in court in response to the lawsuit.
A rent-and-possession, unlawful detainer or expedited eviction lawsuit must be served on the defendant at least four days before the initial court date (called the “return date”) specified in the summons. A contract action must be served at least 10 days before the initial court date. Your attorney must appear on the initial court date or risk dismissal of the case.
There are three typical results of the initial court appearance:
In eviction cases, if the defendant disputes the petition at the initial court appearance and is still in possession of the leased premises, the court usually sets a trial date one to two weeks later and informs the parties on the spot. However, if the defendant has vacated the premises by the time of the initial court appearance, the court will set the trial at a later time and notify the defendant by mail; in this event, the trial typically takes place three to six weeks after the initial court date.
In rent-and-possession, unlawful detainer and expedited eviction cases, the statutes require service of the summons and petition on the defendant at least 4 days before the initial court date. Typically the initial court date is set approximately 3 weeks after the filing of the suit to allow sufficient time for service. The initial court date will have to be delayed if the lawsuit cannot be served at least 4 days before that date.
Summonses are only valid for 30 days after issuance. If they cannot be served within that time frame, a new summons will have to be issued, leading to further delay. Assuming reasonably prompt service of the lawsuit on the defendant and no unusual delays, the following are typical time frames to obtain a judgment in landlord-tenant cases:
Landlords occasionally encounter a situation in which trespassers or other unauthorized persons are living in or frequenting the landlord’s property. If a trespasser has not been given permission by anyone (including other tenants) to live on the property, the police likely will assist in removing the person without the landlord having to sue for eviction, but the police may require that the person first be given a trespass notice. There is a form for this below.
Occasionally situations arise in which a tenant gives permission to a person to live at a landlord’s property. Even if the tenant had no legal authority to give such permission (and under most leases the tenant would not have such authority), the police generally would not treat the person as a trespasser and remove him without court action. Another situation that sometimes occurs is that a person living at a landlord’s property is really nothing more than a “squatter,” but for some reason the police decide not to treat the person as a trespasser. In either of these situations, the landlord must serve a “demand for possession” on the unauthorized person and then can immediately file suit for unlawful detainer if the person fails to vacate. There is a form for demand for possession below. Occasionally a situation arises in which a person who originally had permission to occupy premises is no longer so authorized. A common scenario is the situation where an owner of real estate invites a person to live at there and later decides to withdraw the invitation after the person has lived there for a period of time (e.g., woman invites man to live with her, man moves in, they don’t get along, woman wants man to leave, and man refuses). The man in this example is known in the law as a “tenant at will.” A Missouri statute requires a written notice to terminate a tenancy at will. See the form for termination of tenancy at will.
Abandoned Premises
Occasionally a tenant will simply abandon leased premises and leave items of his or her personal property behind. When this occurs, the tenant typically cannot be located, so you cannot file a lawsuit to determine your right to remove and dispose of the tenant’s personal property.
You will want to post a "notice of abandoned property" on the premises and wait 10 days beofre taking any action. The premises will be deemed abandoned if rent is due and has been unpaid for 30 days, and the landlord has a reasonable belief that the tenant has vacated and intends not to return.
To use this procedure, the landlord must post a written notice in specified form on the premises and mail the same notice to the last-known address of the tenant by both first-class and certified mail, return receipt requested. If the tenant then fails within 10 days to either pay rent or respond in writing stating the tenant’s intention not to abandon the premises, the landlord can remove and dispose of the tenant’s property without liability to the tenant.
In recent years, landlords and property managers have experienced a surge of requests by tenants to keep “emotional support animals” even when animals are not usually permitted. In the law, the correct legal term for such animals is “assistance animal.” There is another legal category called “service animal.” For both categories, the law prohibits charging a pet deposit or pet fee. This post explains the law on assistance and service animals and how to evaluate tenant requests to keep them.
The most recent guidelines issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) concerning “assistance animals” and “service animals” were published in April 2013. According to those guidelines, there are three federal laws that include provisions relating to “assistance animals” and “service animals,” which are different categories of animals. The three laws are:
No provisions of Missouri law impose requirements greater than these three laws. Therefore, the following summary of requirements is based on the above-mentioned HUD guidelines.
Both the FHAct and Section 504 require “reasonable accommodation” of persons with disabilities and must be taken into account when persons with disabilities use (or seek to use) assistance animals in housing where the provider ordinarily prohibits animals or imposes restrictions or conditions relating to animals.
Under these laws, an assistance animal is not deemed to be a pet. Rather, an assistance animal is one that works, provides assistance, or performs tasks for the benefit of a person with a disability, or provides emotional support that alleviates one or more identified symptoms or effects of a person’s disability. Neither of these laws require an assistance animal to be individually trained or certified. While dogs are the most common assistance animals, other species can also be assistance animals.
When a housing provider receives a request to use an assistance animal as a reasonable accommodation for disability, the provider must consider two issues:
1. Does the person seeking to use and live with the animal have a disability, i.e., a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities?
2. Does the person making the request have a disability-related need for an assistance animal? I.e., does the animal work, provide assistance, perform tasks or services for the benefit of a person with a disability, or provide emotional support that alleviates one or more of the identified symptoms of a person’s existing disability?
● If the answer to either 1 or 2 is “no,” then the FHAct and Section 504 do not require the housing provider to modify a “no pets” policy or modify other restrictions on pets, and the reasonable accommodation request may be denied.
● If the answer to both 1 and 2 is “yes,” then the FHAct and Section 504 require the housing provider to modify or provide an exception to “no pets” rules or other pet restrictions and allow the person with a disability to live with and use an assistance animal in all areas of the premises where persons are normally allowed to go, unless:
a. Making the exception would impose an undue financial and administrative burden on the provider or would fundamentally alter the nature of the housing provider’s services; or
b. The specific assistance animal in question poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others that cannot be reduced or eliminated by another reasonable accommodation; or
c. The specific assistance animal in question would cause substantial physical damage to the property of others that cannot be reduced or eliminated by another reasonable accommodation.
Note: In making a determination under b. and c., breed, size and weight limitations may not be applied to an assistance animal. A determination that an assistance animal poses a direct threat of harm to others or would cause substantial physical damage to property must be based on an individualized assessment that relies on objective evidence about the specific animal’s actual behavior – not on mere speculation or fear about the types of harm or damage an animal might cause and not on evidence about harm or damage that other animals have caused.
Assessing an Assistance Animal Request: A housing provider may not deny a request to have an assistance animal simply because the provider is not totally certain the applicant qualifies. Responses to assistance animal requests may not be unreasonably delayed. The following rules apply:
1. If the applicant has a readily apparent disability and need for an assistance animal, such as a blind or low-vision person using a guide dog, or if the disability and need is already known to the housing provider, the provider may not request documentation of disability and need and must allow the animal.
2. If the disability is readily apparent or known, but the disability-related need for an assistance animal is not readily apparent or known, the housing provider may ask the applicant to provide documentation of the disability-related need for the animal.
3. If no disability is readily apparent or known to the housing provider, the provider may ask an applicant to submit documentation of the disability and disability-related need for an assistance animal.
Notes: In situations 2 and 3, the housing provider may either require the applicant to have documentation completed by a professional and submitted to the housing provider before a determination is made or require the applicant to provide essentially the same information in the form of a signed letter or note from the professional who examined the applicant. However, the housing provider is not entitled to request access to medical records or to request permission to interview healthcare professionals. We believe the housing provider may insist that the documentation of need be based on an in-person examination by a qualified professional because there is general agreement among the healing professions that an appropriate diagnosis cannot be made without such an examination; therefore, in our opinion, housing providers are not required to accept a “certificate” obtained by a tenant from a website where the tenant simply pays a fee and fills out an online questionnaire to obtain the certificate without being examined in person by the certificate issuer.
If it is determined that a person must be allowed to use and live with an assistance animal, a housing provider may not impose conditions and restrictions on the animal that it otherwise imposes on pets, including size and breed limitations. Also, a housing provider may not require a pet deposit or pet fee. Any pet agreement or pet clause in a lease must be modified to eliminate any pet deposit/fee requirement. However, the housing provider may require a tenant at the conclusion of a lease to pay the cost of repairs for damage an assistance animal caused to the tenant’s dwelling unit or common areas beyond ordinary wear and tear so long as it is the provider’s normal practice to charge all tenants for damage to the premises beyond ordinary wear and tear.
As mentioned above, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) applies in the housing context to public housing agencies, public universities and schools that provide housing, and public accommodations including rental offices. Thus, private-sector landlords and property managers will most often need to keep this law in mind with regard to housing applicants who seek to enter a rental office open to the public while accompanied by a service dog.
Under ADA regulations promulgated by the U.S. Department of Justice, a “service animal” is defined narrowly as a dog that is individually trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of an individual with a disability, including a physical, sensory, psychiatric, intellectual, or other mental disability. The regulations specify that “the provision of emotional support, well-being, comfort, or companionship do not constitute work or tasks for the purposes of this definition.” Thus, emotional support animals are expressly excluded from the definition of service animals under the ADA.
An individual’s use of a qualified service dog in a rental office or other ADA-covered facility must not be handled as a request for reasonable accommodation under the FHAct or Section 504. Rather, in ADA-covered facilities, the dog need only meet the definition of “service animal” to be allowed into the facility.
If it is readily apparent that the dog is trained to do work or perform tasks for a person with a disability (e.g., the dog is observed guiding a blind person), no inquiry is permitted.
If it is not readily apparent that the dog is trained to help a person with a disability, the facility may ask only these two questions:
1. Is this a service animal that is required because of a disability?
2. What work or tasks has the animal been trained to perform?
Note: No documentation may be required to support the responses to these questions.
If it is determined the dog is a qualified service animal, the dog must be allowed access to all areas of the facility where members of the public are normally allowed to go and may not be denied access unless:
1. The dog is out of control and its handler does not take effective action to control it; or
2. The dog is not housebroken, i.e., not trained to control urination and defecation; or
3. The dog poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others that cannot be eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level by a reasonable modification to the facility’s policies, practices and procedures. This determination must be based on an individualized assessment of the dog’s actual behavior – not on fears, stereotypes or generalization.
If a person entering a rental office with a service dog submits an application to reside at rental premises with the dog, the application then must be evaluated under the FHAct and Section 504 guidelines set out in the preceding section. In almost all situations, a service dog will clearly qualify as an assistance animal that must be allowed.
A new Missouri statute became effective on August 28, 2020, making it a misdemeanor criminal offense to misrepresent an animal as a service dog or assistance animal.
Service dogs
A person who misrepresents that a dog is a service dog can be found guilty of a class C misdemeanor for the first offense and a class B misdemeanor for a second offense. The person can also be held civilly liable for actual damages resulting from the misrepresentation. Misrepresentation includes but is not limited to:
Assistance animals
A person who misrepresents that an animal is an assistance animal can be found guilty of a class C misdemeanor for the first offense and a class B misdemeanor for a second offense. The person can also be held civilly liable for actual damages resulting from the misrepresentation. Misrepresentation includes but is not limited to:
Penalties
Class C misdemeanor penalties are a fine up to $750 and imprisonment for up to 15 days.
Class B misdemeanor penalties are a fine up to $1,000 and imprisonment for up to 6 months.
Effect of statute
The number of inquiries received by JPS from landlords and property managers concerning assistance/emotional support animals has decreased substantially since the statute became effective. We used to receive several inquiries each month. Currently we are receiving about one such inquiry per month.
Landlords and property managers can help increase the effectiveness of the statute by posting the following information:
The following Missouri statutory sections became effective on August 28, 2022:
Sec. 209.204. 1. Any person who knowingly impersonates a person with a disability for the purpose of receiving the accommodations regarding service dogs under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101, et seq., is guilty of a class C misdemeanor and shall also be civilly liable for the amount of any actual damages resulting from such impersonation. Any second or subsequent violation of this section is a class B misdemeanor.
Sec. 209.204.2. No person shall knowingly misrepresent a dog as a service dog for the purpose of receiving the accommodations regarding service dogs under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101, et seq. For purposes of this section, “misrepresent a dog as a service dog” means a representation by word or action that a dog has been trained as a service dog as defined in section 16 209.200.
Sec. 209.204.3. No person shall knowingly misrepresent any animal as an assistance animal for the purpose of receiving the accommodations regarding assistance animals under the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 3601, et seq., or the Rehabilitation Act, U.S.C. Section 701, et seq. For the purposes of this section an “assistance animal” is an animal that works, provides assistance, or performs tasks, or is being trained to work, provide assistance, or perform tasks, for the benefit of a person with a disability, or that provides emotional support that alleviates one or more identified effects of a person’s disability. While dogs are the most common type of assistance animal, other animals may also be assistance animals.
A first offense under these sections is a class C misdemeanor, punishable by a fine up to $750 and imprisonment for up to 15 days. A second offense is a class B misdemeanor, punishable by a fine up to $1,000 and imprisonment for up to 6 months.
Forms for use in Landlord-Tenant cases. NOTE: The use of these forms without individualized legal advice may not fully protect the landlord or allow the desired remedies. These are provided for educational purposes only. There is no guaranty that the forms are valid for yoru own use.
VERIFICATION w sscra (docx)
DownloadNotice of Entry 24 Hours (docx)
DownloadNotice of Abandoned Property (doc)
DownloadDemand for Rent and Possession (doc)
DownloadNotice Non Reneal of Lease (doc)
DownloadTrespass Notice (doc)
DownloadDemand for Possession - No Lease Squatter (doc)
DownloadNotice To Terminate Month to Month Lease (doc)
DownloadNotice To Terminate Mobile Home Lot Lease (doc)
Download10 Day Notice to Vacate (docx)
DownloadNotice to Terminate Tenancy at Sufference (docx)
DownloadNotice of Intent to File Expedited Eviction (docx)
DownloadA "cash for keys" agreement is an arrangement where a landlord pays a tenant to voluntarily move out of a rental property, rather than going through the legal process of eviction. The tenant agrees to vacate the premises by a specified date in exchange for a lump sum of money. This can be a faster and more cost-effective way for landlords to regain possession of their property. Here's a more detailed look at what a cash for keys agreement involves:
In essence, a cash for keys agreement is a negotiated solution to ensure a smooth and efficient move-out, benefiting both the landlord and the tenant. A suggested for is available for use below.
CASH FOR KEYS AGREEMENT (docx)
DownloadPlease reach us at tr@hoeflelaw.com if you cannot find an answer to your question.
An eviction is the only legal process for a landlord to remove a tenant or occupant from real property through court action. In Missouri, there are 4 kinds of evictions: Rent and Possession, Unlawful Detainer, Expedited Eviction, and Ejectment.
Rent and Possession is a lawsuit filed to recover a judgment for possession of yyour rental property and a monetary judgment for past due rent and late fees.
Unlawful detainer is the kind of action filed when your tenant has violated their lease, violated the law, failed to vacate after foreclosure, or failed to vacate when their lease expired or was terminated.
Expedited Eviction or Emergency Eviction is a statutorily allowed fast-tracked eviction for limited circumstances including, violence, drug-related criminal activity, significant property damage, and other limited circumstances.
Ejectment is a case filed to determine ownership and possession of property. It is used to determine who has the right to possession and to remove the person not in rightful possession of property. Typically this happens when there is no landlord-tenant relationship, such asafter the death of a co-occupant who was not an owner.
Attorneys use John Doe and Jane Doe to represent unknown adults residing in the property in order to allow the sheriff to evict all adults. We typically include these if we know that there is an adult who is not on the lease who is residing in the property.
While this was common many years ago, it is now clearly illegal for a landlord to terminate services to evict or aid in the eviction of their tenants. This is called "self help" eviction and can result in criminal liability as well as civil penalties.
Contact Hoefle Law, LLC to get started.
Demand Letter (if appropriate)
Drafting Petition
Review and verification of Petition
Filing Petition
Serving the Tenant - done by sheriff's deputy or private process server
Court Appearance
Trial - if necessary
Judgment - judgment is final 10 days after signed
Writ of Possession - allows the sheriff to remove tenant, starts after the 10 day waiting period.
Collection - Hoefle Law can garnish bank accounts and wages to collect your money
We will need:
The name and contact information of the owner/manager of the property.
The name and contact information for the tenant(s).
The Lease for the property.
The ledger for the property.
Reason for eviction.
These can be sent via mail, email, dropped off or any other reasonable way.
You are welcome to attend your court date or any landlord-tenant docket to see how they work. Typically in a rent and Possession case if the tenant disputes the amount, it will be set for trial at a later date, and you will be required to have a witness there. Thus, it is not required to attend teh first court date. I encourage witnesses to attend Unlawful Detainer Court dates in most circumstances because courts will sometimes try those cases on eth initial court date. If you are the there and the Defendant is not you will win by default and not have to testify. If you are not there and the Defendant is it will be set for trial at a later date. There is no harm in this but can cause an unnecessary delay.